Anastasia Mystery Officially Solved But Doubts Remain

The Romanov Royal Family

On This Date In History: The Romanov Royal Family in Russia met its doom. Czar Nicholas II was put in a bad spot as he was not really trained to be the Czar. He took the throne in 1896 and was pretty aloof; detached from the needs of his subjects. He committed the nation to an ill-advised war war with the Japanese in 1904.  The Russo-Japanese War ended pretty quickly with the Russian fleet annihilated quickly following a naval battle north of Japan.   

Execution Took Place in This Cellar

About a decade later Russia, like other European countries, was bound by a series of complicated alliances that took Russia and much of the rest of Europe into World War I with an army that was completely ill-equipped for modern warfare. They had lots of guys but they were more suited for a war in 1814 instead of 1914.   The people had gotten angry in 1905 and forced the Czar to create the Duma, a form of Congress. But he kept on dissolving the Duma whenever it came up with some sort of reforms. The war effort was denying the people basic necessities and Nick’s subjects became even angrier to the point of revolt though Nicholas remained oblivious to the people’s needs and their unrest.  So, in 1917 the Russian Revolution broke out. In July 1918 they captured the royal family and on this date in 1918, the family was lined up for a photograph and then gunned down.  A pit was alleged to have been dug and the bodies tossed in an burned.

Anna 1953, Anastasia 1916

Anna 1953, Anastasia 1916

Rumor was that the whole family was killed except for Anastasia, the young daughter. During the 20th century, several women showed up in Europe and even the United States claiming to be Anastasia. The most convincing of these Anastasias was a woman, Anna Anderson, who moved to the United States and died there in 1984. The gravesite for the family was a state secret during the time of the Soviet Union.  But, with the end of communist rule the secret was revealed.  In 1991, the bodies of the Royal Family were exhumed from their supposed grave near the town of Ekaterinburg only to find that the mystery was not solved.  The grave of the Romanovs only had 5 bodies, not 7;  two were missing.  The missing bodies were that of the young male Romanov, Alexi Nikolaevich and one of his sisters.  It was assumed that the missing girl was Anastasia.   The bones in the grave were examined and  DNA comparisons between Anna Anderson and the Royal Family proved she was not Anastasia.  On July 17, 1998 a funeral was held for the 5 members of the Romanov family that had been found, almost exactly 80 years after they were killed.   In January 2008, scientists in Russia claimed that they a few months before had found the charred remains of two children near Ekaterinburg.  In April 2008, forensic experts claimed that they had confirmed that the remains were that one of  Alelxi and one of his sisters.  In March 2009,  apublished report  verified that all of the Romanov family had been identified and no one had survived the execution.  Case close, right?  Not exactly.

Only the Remains of 5 of the Romanov Family was Initially Found; Why would they kill all 7 and then not bury two children with the rest of the family?

I wonder why the executioners would not put all of the bodies together.  It also seems quite convenient that two sets of charred remains just happen to show up near the grave site.  But, my musings aside, a Stanford University study released in 2004 questions the original assertion that the 5 sets of bones unearthed in 1991 belonged to the Romanov family to begin with.  That would throw everything up in the air, including the claims of Anna Anderson.  When news of the Stanford report hit the press, it caused somewhat of a stir among the scientists who had concluded that the case was closed.  After all, part of the premise was that the investigation was flawed and that called into question the integrity and ability of the original scientists.   It always seems that these conspiracies live on forever.  Whenever a credible person produces evidence for one side of a story, another credible person counters the previous credible evidence.  And then there are always unanswered questions such as why the two children were not buried with the rest or how the rumor of Anastasia’s survival even came up in the first place.  I guess the saddest part of this sort of thing is that some folks spend most of their lives trying to disprove or prove points related to issues that really make little difference.  Beside that, if the absolute truth of Anastasia were to be of total certainty, then the events in 1918 would not be nearly as interesting and perhaps forgotten.  One thing Anna Anderson did do was to keep the memory of the murder of the Romanov family alive for nearly a century.

Rain heaviest in Southern Indiana

Weather Bottom Line:

  On Thursday night there were a couple of shortwaves out to the west that were approaching the area.   As they wound down, the also slowed down over the western parts of the viewing area and rained themselves out to the tune of 1-3 inches over places like Crawford and Dubois County.  I had figured that was the rain chance for our area on Friday and, sure enough, by midday you could tell that there was very little in the way of vertical development of the clouds which indicated that there was a suppression going on and that rain chances would be limited.  As I looked at the morning analysis, that was also the front so temperatures and humidity will be limited on Friday, though it still will be pretty warm.  The front doesn’t get far and also more or less washes out to our south over the weekend.  However, it should provide enough instability to give us some isolated or maybe scattered t’storms for the weekend.  Highs will be in the low 90’s with somewhat humid conditions but nothing too extreme.


7 Responses

  1. People who try to disprove the Anastasia mystery are leading sceintists and historians. These people are not wasting their lives! That is very stupid of you to say that! The truth is that Anna was Anastasia and the bones they found in 2007 were not the bones of Anastasia bit the bone fragments of the missing fragments of the Romanov bodies that were found!

  2. I dont think anna anderson was anastasia they are not even close in the looka like factor they are totally diiferent people

  3. Anna ANderson is not Anastsia they dont even look alike

  4. What Naystia wrote a couple of years ago has recently occurred to me as well, i.e., were the 44 bone fragments found in 2008 really Alexi’s and Maria’s/Anastasia’s, or were they merely bone fragments from the other members of the Romanov family found in 1991? Were they able to identify WHICH bones these were fragments of, and determine with certainty that these bone fragments were NOT from the skeletal remains found in 1991? Or did they just assume these were Alexi’s and Maria’s/Anastasia’s, since they had already accounted for five of the seven Romanov’s? Maybe someone can point me in the direction of a paper or study that addresses these questions…..

  5. I had always believed that Anna Anderson was, in fact Anastasia Romanov. Even when the rest of the world was satisfied that the DNA tests proved she was not. I realize this makes virtually no sense, but, nevertheless I continue to hang onto my assumption….just a hunch…gut feeling…maybe…just a romantic hope that at least one of these beautiful innocent children cheated death. BTW, Jennifer..if you continue to search photos of Anastasia and Anna, you can’t help but see the very real similarity in their looks. I wish someone would do the test whereby the eye distance and measurements of other facial features are done and compared to each of the two women…I’ve heard this test is very accurate and proves identity or not. I will, no doubt go to my grave believing Anna is and always was Anastasia!

  6. I have a question, too. I recall reading that many years ago…before he was married and a father, he suffered an assassination attempt in Japan…if I remember correctly, it was a head wound. I wonder if there was any mark on his scull that would corroborate this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: