Data Suggests the Ozone Hole May Be Growing, not Improving. The Media has been silent
July 5, 2009

Not Much Change in Ozone Hole from '87 to '99

Not Much Change in Ozone Hole from '87 to '99

Ozone Hole Plot

Ozone Hole Plot

Remember the Ozone hole in the Antarctic?  The chart at the right appears to show that the ozone hole is growing, not shrinking, which would be at odds with those who think that the problem is solved.  In fact, a 2006 report showed that in that year, the ozone hole was at record levels.  Didn’t see that in a movie or on the news, did you?   I reported in November 2008 that the Ozone hole was the 5th largest recorded in history. 

 In my mind the depletion of the ozone layer is the gravest concern regarding global pollution, followed by water pollution.  I mentioned previously that one could argue that lack of clean water is potentially a bigger threat than global warming.  I consequently got called a “global warming denier” even though I said no such thing.  My contention is that the debate is and should continue as to the cause of rising global temperatures.  But, no one seems to talk much about ozone depletion. 

Record Ozone Hole 2006...Is the Hole Growing?

Record Ozone Hole 2006...Is the Hole Growing?

The reason why I put the ozone issue at the top of the list is that without the ozone, all life dies. Period.  Global warming will alter the planet markedly, potentially cause economic and political upheavel and alter certain species habitats.  It would be a mess.  Water pollution is more dire, in my view, because it is definitely happening now and bodies of water are dead and people around the world cannot get clean water which is a basic need of life.  But ozone…that’s an end gamer.  While its been forgotten by the media and most in the public, research continues and recently, there was an acknowledgement of the continuation of the ozone hole when it was postulated that perhaps, the Antarctic Ozone Hole might be responsible for an increase in sea ice, which would answer why sea ice has been growing in Antarctica instead of shrinking as per the global warming model. 

montreal_smallIn the 1987, Congress and other political bodies around the world agreed to the Montreal Protocal that would cut in half the production of chemicals that were seen to destroy the ozone layer by 1998.   Further study was done and in 1992 it was determined that the ozone layer was in worse shape than was originally thought, so an agreement was hammered out to end halon production completely by 1994 and CFC’s by 1996.   If you want the most recent stuff on the Ozone hole, NASA has Ozone Watch

Here’s the rub about the whole thing.  In 1987, the cutbacks on Halons and CFCs began.  The ozone hole continued to grow.  That would be expected because aerosols released at the surface generally take about 15 years or so to reach the stratosphere.  Hence, a reaction to the legislation wouldn’t be felt for some time.   The science was supposedly “settled” in the eyes of the public and the media.  So no one much paid attention.  A few years later, it is found that the settled science was wrong!  So much for ending discussions among scientists.  So, the conclusion was that things were worse than previously presented and so halons and CFC’s were banned altogether.  Much of what has been written lately claims that the problem is getting better.  But if you look at the chart at the upper right, you find that the 2008 level of depletion is less than the 97-98 peak, but still higher than in recent years.    The problem is still there.  Whether or not last year was an anomoly or a trend remains to be seen.  But focus needs to remain sharp.  Like water pollution, this is a real threat that we know for certain is happening.  The facts have changed over time and I wouldn’t be surprised to see it change again.  Wonder what would happen if it were found that the ozone depletion was part of a larger phenomena that we are not aware of…something that passing a few laws cannot change?  But, man loves to think that he is in charge and can do anything.

Weather Bottom Line:  We have a frontal zone set up just to our south.  Overrunning moisture is producing clouds that will keep our temperatures in check.  A wave will run along the front to the south and produce some pretty good t’storms.  I think the official forecast has some sort of risk for t’storms around here but, like yesterday, unless I see some sunshine then I won’t be too worried about that.  Once the wave passes, the front will get energized and move farther south taking the clouds with it.  High pressure will build in and we’ll have sunshine with seasonal temperatures for the much of the week ahead.

Global Warming Goof: IPCC Can’t Verify Data? Herbert Hoover a Socialist? Ozone Hole Spin? Smoking Ban Lifted?
November 17, 2008

00Z 1117 NAM 60 Hr. Wed AM Surface

00Z 1117 NAM 60 Hr. Wed AM Surface

Look for a front to move through on Monday. There may be some sunshine just after the front moves through but the clouds should return late Monday.  After a blustery and brisk Monday, a very isolated chance of a flurry but really the story is the mercury.  Tuesday morning mid to upper 20′s.  Tuesday afternoon probably not out of the 30′s despite sunshine.  Wednesday morning low to mid 20′s.  We don’t see any 50′s until next weekend.

IPCC Can’t Verify it’s Data? Back in July I posted articles that questioned the veracity of the research

What Happened To This Graph From the 1990 IPCC Report?

What Happened To This Graph From the 1990 IPCC Report?

used by the United Nations and its International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).  In that post (here) you find that there were many people who questioned the infamous “hockey stick” graph that showed a relatively steady temperature throughout the time frame until you get to the 20th century at which time temperatures go straight up.  I wondered about where the “mini-ice age” was from about 1350 to about 1850 and also the previous time from around 1000 to 1300 in which the Vikings were runnnig around Greenland raising crops and sheep.  As it turns out, more learned people than I asked the same question and the IPCC was forced to capitulate and admit that their hockey stick graph was false.  Now it seems that the data from at least one month was corrupted and after saying that October was the hottest on record, the IPCC has had to back track again and admit that their data was wrong.  In fact, circumstantial data so far indicates that October may be the exact opposite of the initial erroneous report.  Two aspects of this latest fiasco concerns me.  One is that the people in charge admit that they do “not have the resources

IPCC Has Revised Forecast Downward

IPCC Has Revised Forecast Downward

to exercise quality control” over the data that it collects!!!  So, now we find out that the International Panel on Climate Change has no way to monitor the veracity of their data collection.  Yet, these are the people controlling the information that governments around the world are basing thier future policies and economies.  The other thing that troubles me is that THIS REPORT comes to my attention via the London Telegraph.  I can’t find any American media outlets that have brought this to the attention of the people of the United States.  Mr. Gore told us that the debate was over, yet he based his movie and this statement on a bunch of people who admit that the have no quality control over the data.  Doesn’t the American public have the right to know such reports and the explanation?  The IPCC reports were top of the newscast stories on the national networks…but this one gets buried.  Why do you think that is so?

ozone_holeRevised Ozone Report  If you recall, a few days ago I brought to you a report that said that the ozone hole was the 5th largest ever recorded.  I suppose others had a similar reaction to what I had which was that there was legislation that was supposed to cure the ozone hole and everything was fixed and we could feel safe.  Well, it looks like to me that someone high up the chain didn’t like the headline and ordered someone to make a revision because here is the new, revised report, that opens by saying that the US has reduced its ozone depleting substance production by over 97%!!!  Amazing how you can spin one story.  Here is the latest version.  Compare it with the old version which was just a few days old.

Herbert Hoover Bashing  In these economic times, we’ve heard that we face the worst crisis since Herbert Hoover.  In the 1992 election cycle we were told that it was the worst economy since Herbert

Misunderstood? A Socialist?

Misunderstood? A Socialist?

Hoover.  Of course, if a Democrat was in office during the election-time downturn, the cry would be that its the worst economy since Jimmy Carter.  Anyway, this past election we heard charges of socialism.  Did you know that in the 1932 one of the candidates was charged with having socialistic policies because of his desire for government intervention in the economy?  It’s true and the charge was made against Herbert Hoover by Franklin Roosevelt.  We have always been taught in school that Hoover just sat back and wanted to let the market place take care of the problem.  In truth, Hoover was seen as an interventionist because of all of the pumping of governmental dollars into the system.  After he lost the election, Franklin Roosevelt did the same thing but on an even grander scale.  There are historians who, in this time of Hoover bashing, want to give the reputation of Herbie a makeover.  Here is the story from the Wall Street Journal that appeared in the election day edition.  It accurately points out that Hoover was a man of many great accomplishments before and after his term in office…it’s just that things didn’t go so well during that one term and that has been his legacy. And that’s a shame because he was in many regards a great man.

Fire It Up!

Fire It Up!

Smoke’em If You Gottem:  And finally, again from our friends at the London Daily Telegraph…seems that several months ago a smoking ban was put into effect on the casinos at Atlantic City.  Casino owners argued that business would suffer because other casinos in the country didn’t have smoking bans.  Business would suffer, they said. The Atlantic City city council said nonsense.  Now that revenues are down at area casinos, and therefore tax revenues, the city council apparently agrees with the casino owners because the smoking ban has been lifted.(video story)  Light’em up and head to Atlantic City!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers