At the end of last year, the Wall Street Journal reported the assessment of Igor Panarin who said that US would “disintegrate” by June or July of 2010. He said that a collapse of economy and of morals would result in a Civil War that would end with the United States being broken into the Republic of Texas, The Californian Republic, the Central North American Republic, Atlantic America and Russia would lay claim to Alaska while Hawaii would hook up with either China or Japan. The journal describes Mr. Panarin as a “Russian Academic” and later points out that he is a former member of the KGB. It seems that another professor has come up with a similar prediction in a new book called, The Fall of the US Empire-and Then What? Johan Galtung explains his new rationale in and interview with Russia Today. He thinks that the fall began with the Korean War and claims that he had successfully predicted previous events, such as the fall of the Soviet Union. But, Professor Galtung, the Norwegian sociologist and a principal founder of the discipline of Peace and conflict studies, offers hope. He says what the US can do to avoid his gloomy forecast and its not another stimulus package, but instead a mixed bag of geopolitical action. Keep in mind the book was published by Transcend Peace University Press and it provides the prolog to Galtung’s book. I wonder if he would have had any marital advice to give Abraham Lincoln because…
She actually is a rather interesting figure and there have been several biographies about her and numerous…hundreds…..written about Lincoln which delve into their relationship, how it affected his presidency. Its probably a good idea to read several to get some sort of perspective because each author will come at it from different perspectives and sometimes with a preconceived agenda or notion of what they want to say. Jean Baker has one of the more recent biographies of Mary Todd and it paints a very sympathetic portrait by often using late 20th century sensibilities and transporting them back to the 19th century. In my view, that is a flaw because you really can’t take modern psychology and modern ideals of society and try to use them to create a portrait of a person from the past. I believe its like comparing apples to oranges and is often a problem when trying to draw conclusions. One must understand the thinking and customs of the day when examining the events and people of the past. If you look closely, you find that Professor Baker received funding from the Elizabeth Connolly Todd Foundation. Like I said, biographers look at subjects from different perspectives and different photos…the one adorning the Baker portrait of Todd is not the same presented above.